![]() “I regret sending out a tweet today alluding to the firing of Corey Lewandowski. Schumer declines to state confidence in Manhattan district attorney Alvin. Tucker Carlson ‘enraged’ private texts revealed ‘I love Trump’Ĭalifornia sea otters killed by rare parasite strain: study Why millions of people could lose Medicaid next monthįake AI images of ‘Trump arrest’ hit internet Manhattan DA cancels Wednesday meeting of grand jury in hush money probe ![]() Young Americans are once again switching up how they date Oversight panel distances from Gaetz, Greene push to bring Tara Reade for. Ĭalifornia bill could ban the sale of Skittles, Hot Tamales, and moreįox News reporter hugs son on camera as he leaves site of Denver school shooting ![]() Jordan expands probe into Manhattan DA with testimony requests from former. Mystery surrounds possible Trump indictment More than 40 percent of Americans support banning TikTok: poll ![]() Jackson pens solo dissent as Supreme Court vacates abortion ruling Trump lashes out at DeSantis over Piers Morgan interview This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. “It could be Mar-a-Lago staff, it could be the president, it could be his lawyers.” “I don’t know who the one or more people are,” he added. How Manhattan prosecutors’ ‘zombie’ case led to possible Trump indictmentĮven so, he warned, “I do think, based on the affidavit, that the jeopardy faced by one or more people continues to rise.” Zaid emphasized that it is not yet clear that Trump himself is the target of the criminal investigation, only that investigators believe evidence of a crime could be found at Mar-a-Lago.Ĭruz proposes constitutional amendment to stop Supreme Court-packing “While we don’t know what that information pertains to, by its very definition it could conceivably threaten individuals’ lives,” said Mark Zaid, an attorney who specializes in national security matters. Those details alone disconcert experts in the field. In total, the affidavit said, there were 184 such documents, 67 of which were marked as confidential, 92 of which were marked as secret and 25 of which were marked as top secret. In particular, it revealed that of the 15 boxes that had been retrieved from Mar-a-Lago roughly one year after Trump left office, 14 contained information that had classified markings. Still, information that was disclosed brought a new level of granular detail into the public domain. The department further argued that “the government has well-founded concerns that steps may be taken to frustrate or otherwise interfere with this investigation if facts in the affidavit were prematurely disclosed.” In a related document also released on Friday, the DOJ contended that the redactions were necessary because of the imperative to “protect the safety of multiple civilian witnesses” in the burgeoning case. The bureau’s reasons for this assertion remain mysterious, however, given the extensive redactions to the 32-page affidavit. It’s impossible to square that claim with the FBI’s assertion in the affidavit that investigators had “probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found” in a Mar-a-Lago search. The same Trump filing refers to a June 8 letter in which the DOJ “requested, in pertinent part, that the storage room be secured” - a request that is implied to have been met when Trump told staff to put a second lock on the door.īy contrast, the DOJ’s affidavit quotes a letter on the same date - presumably the same letter - reiterating to a Trump lawyer that there was no “secure location authorized for the storage of classified information” anywhere at the resort. According to a Trump legal filing earlier this week, one of the FBI agents, having been shown the storage room in which some documents were held, purportedly said, “Now it all makes sense.” The former president and his allies have, for instance, described an affable visit to Mar-a-Lago by a senior DOJ official, Jay Bratt, and three FBI agents on June 3. It gives a far less friendly account than Team Trump has done of events in June of this year. But the affidavit that persuaded a judge to grant the search warrant tells a different story.Įven in heavily redacted form, the affidavit points out that there was a prolonged process lasting around seven months in 2021 before Trump’s team coughed up any documents at all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |